Here are several of the sources I am working through and will cite:
Colloquium Oecumenicum Paulinum, and Karl P Donfried. “1 Timothy Reconsidered.” Peeters, 2008.
- Well balanced, recent scholarship, excellent chapters from Margaret M. Mitchell and Luke Timothy Johnson, Karl Donfried’s comments are both commanding and centering.
Guthrie, Donald. “The Pastoral Epistles and the Mind of Paul.” Website. BiblicalStudies.org.uk, n.d..
- Older article available as a PDF, good introduction to the issue, holds to a Pauline writing of the letters.
Hylen, Susan. “The Paradox of Women in the Early Church: 1 Timothy and the Acts of Paul and Thecla.” Website. as.vanderbilt.edu, April 2012. (JBL?)
- Seeks to break current/basic mindset regarding the roles of women in the early church, pursuasively contends that 1 Timothy and the Acts of Paul and Thecla do not portray opposite perspecives with regard to the portrayal of women.
James, M. R. The Acts of Paul and Thecla. Website. earlychristianwritings.com, Trans. 1924.
- Believed to be a second century document written by a Christian bishop who was later removed from his position for having written it, Tertullian’s comments about it promote the possibility that it was popular oral tradition among the early churches.
Knight, George William. The Pastoral Epistles: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1992.
- One of the first in the NIGNT series, surprisingly conservative, more surprisingly lacks insight at pivotal points, holds to Pauline authorship.
MacDonald, Dennis Ronald. The Legend and the Apostle: The Battle for Paul in Story and Canon. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Westminister, 1983.
- The book that got me thinking, compares & contrasts The Acts of Paul and Thecla to the Pastorals, holds to a purposeful second century pseudonymous authorship as a corrective to Christian asceticism.
MacDonald, Margaret Y. The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutrero-Pauline Writings. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Out the gate states the Pastorals are deutero-Pauline, looks at the issue sociologically with a view to the institutionalization of the church.
Miller, James D. The Pastoral Letters as Composite Documents. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
- The second book that got me thinking ( I am currently on my second read), sees the Pastorals as composite documents much like The Gospel of Thomas was believed to be collected and distributed as a whole most likely in the late first or early second century.
Misselbrook, Peter. Paul’s Letters to Timothy and Titus. Website. Misselbrook’s Musings, 2002.
- From his notes on the Greek New Testament and downloadable as a PDF, an excellent resource to read as a commentary as you read the Greek, typically quotes conservative scholarship, portrays a Pauline authorship in his notes.
Rumney, Gavin. “Issues Surrounding the Authorship and Dating of The Pastoral Epistles” Blog. Otagosh, May 6, 2008.
- Another good introduction available as a PDF from a fellow New Zealand blogger.
- Interpreting Scripture – The Pastoral Epistles As A Test Case (earlychurchstudies.wordpress.com)