Our habit of thinking of ministry as a ‘profession’ is likely to produce serious distortions in our conception of the church and our role within it ~ Richard B. Hays, 1 Cor.3:18-23
While this is crystal clear to me, I know many Christians simply do not see the distortion (see Part 1). This just goes to show how deeply ingrained we are in our contemporary Western culture and how utterly out of touch we are with the culture of the early church.
There is a popular phrase that states “form follows function” meaning:
If an object has to perform a certain function, its design must support that function to the fullest extent possible. – Digital Web Magazine
In fact, the context in which this was taught was in a class on church planting. And this makes perfect sense, the form follows the function; the design supports how the church works. So, if we have professional ministers, the church structure, from the organizational chart all the way to the actual performance of ministry, in all practicality must serve the professional minster.
Yet, the “fail” is seen in the fact that upon reading the New Testament there simply were no professional ministers or hierarchy, and the design, the form, was quite different from what we have today.
This, then begs the question: If we notice this difference, how do we go about changing it? How do we get back to the original intent? How do we essentially allow for purposeful change that will benefit the church and in turn benefit society? How do we return to a functional ecclesiology?
The answer begins with embracing and encouraging a ministry supported by the New Testament in which all are ministers and all have received gifts and empowerment by the Holy Spirit to serve as Christ here and now every day of the week at any given place on the planet…and maybe beyond!
Take a look at these passages: Romans 12; 1 Corinthians 12; Ephesians 4; 1 Peter 4.
The church is the body, all having a part to play. There are no professional ministers.
Now, there are indeed leaders, often called elders, but nowhere do we see these individuals taking over for the body. Their function is to encourage service – not to take it and to protect the body – not to control it.
Take a look at 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1 for more on this. Again, no professional here either.
So, in short, both the church and her leaders need to be willing to reevaluate the current system to see how functional or dysfunctional it really has become.
- Toward A Functional Ecclesiology… (Part 1 of 2) (earlychurchstudies.wordpress.com)